Archambault Grand Surprise vs Brick
How do the Archambault Grand Surprise and Brick compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Grand Surprise 
Brick | Archambault Grand Surprise | Brick | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.3 ft9.54 m | 31.3 ft9.55 m |
| Waterline length | 29.3 ft8.93 m | 31.3 ft9.55 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.05 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 58 lb26 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | 2,315 lb1,050 kg | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | 602 ft²55.9 m² | 272 ft²25.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 642.83 | 17.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 1 | 58 |
| Comfort ratio | 0.1 | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 10.11 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Archambault Grand Surprise vs Brick: the short version
- The Archambault Grand Surprise and Brick are close in length (31.3 ft9.54 m vs 31.3 ft9.55 m ).
- The Brick is heavier, displacing about 6741% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Grand Surprise carries the more powerful rig (642.8 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Brick scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Brick rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 10.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.