C&C 25 vs C&C 26
How do the C&C 25 and C&C 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 25 
C&C 26 | C&C 25 | C&C 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.2 ft7.67 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 20.7 ft6.30 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 8.6 ft2.62 m | 10.4 ft3.18 m |
| Draft | 3.8 ft1.14 m | 4.6 ft1.40 m |
| Displacement | 4,300 lb1,950 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | 1,900 lb862 kg | 2,040 lb925 kg |
| Sail area | 306 ft²28.4 m² | 331 ft²30.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.52 | 17.21 |
| Displacement / Length | 217 | 184 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 2.38 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.1 | 6.5 |
C&C 25 vs C&C 26: the short version
- The C&C 25 and C&C 26 are close in length (25.2 ft7.67 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- The C&C 26 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 25 carries the more powerful rig (18.5 vs 17.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.38).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.