C&C 37 vs C&C 38
How do the C&C 37 and C&C 38 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 37 
C&C 38 | C&C 37 | C&C 38 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.6 ft11.45 m | 37.6 ft11.45 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.56 m | 12.2 ft3.71 m |
| Draft | 6.7 ft2.04 m | 6.4 ft1.96 m |
| Displacement | 14,300 lb6,486 kg | 14,700 lb6,668 kg |
| Ballast | 6,000 lb2,722 kg | 4,400 lb1,996 kg |
| Sail area | 670 ft²62.2 m² | 674 ft²62.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.20 | 17.97 |
| Displacement / Length | 269 | 260 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.7 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.3 |
C&C 37 vs C&C 38: the short version
- The C&C 37 and C&C 38 are close in length (37.6 ft11.45 m vs 37.6 ft11.45 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 37 carries the more powerful rig (18.2 vs 18.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 37 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.99).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.