C&C 43-1 vs C&C 44
How do the C&C 43-1 and C&C 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 43-1 
C&C 44 | C&C 43-1 | C&C 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.3 ft13.21 m | 44.2 ft13.46 m |
| Waterline length | 35.0 ft10.67 m | 35.3 ft10.74 m |
| Beam | 12.8 ft3.91 m | 13.3 ft4.04 m |
| Draft | 7.0 ft2.13 m | 8.3 ft2.51 m |
| Displacement | 21,314 lb9,668 kg | 20,906 lb9,483 kg |
| Ballast | 9,980 lb4,527 kg | 9,850 lb4,468 kg |
| Sail area | 901 ft²83.7 m² | 924 ft²85.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.75 | 19.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 222 | 213 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.4 | 27.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.85 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.0 |
C&C 43-1 vs C&C 44: the short version
- The C&C 44 is the larger boat at 44.2 ft13.46 m LOA versus 43.3 ft13.21 m for the C&C 43-1.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 44 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 18.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 43-1 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 43-1 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.