Etap 23il vs Etap 26
How do the Etap 23il and Etap 26 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 23il | Etap 23il | Etap 26 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.5 ft7.77 m | 25.8 ft7.85 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.19 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Beam | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 9.0 ft2.75 m |
| Draft | 4.8 ft1.47 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 3,420 lb1,551 kg | 5,084 lb2,306 kg |
| Ballast | 1,035 lb469 kg | 1,568 lb711 kg |
| Sail area | 213 ft²19.8 m² | 286 ft²26.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.01 | 15.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 182 | 224 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.7 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Etap 23il vs Etap 26: the short version
- The Etap 23il and Etap 26 are close in length (25.5 ft7.77 m vs 25.8 ft7.85 m ).
- The Etap 26 is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 26 carries the more powerful rig (15.5 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 26 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 26 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.