Etap 28i vs Etap 30i
How do the Etap 28i and Etap 30i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 28i | Etap 28i | Etap 30i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 28.0 ft8.53 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 26.3 ft8.00 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.12 m | 10.4 ft3.16 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.6 ft1.70 m |
| Displacement | 6,173 lb2,800 kg | 7,715 lb3,499 kg |
| Ballast | 1,808 lb820 kg | 2,425 lb1,100 kg |
| Sail area | 386 ft²35.9 m² | 399 ft²37.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.35 | 16.35 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 190 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.9 |
Etap 28i vs Etap 30i: the short version
- The Etap 30i is the larger boat at 29.3 ft8.94 m LOA versus 28.0 ft8.53 m for the Etap 28i.
- The Etap 30i is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 28i carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 30i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 30i rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.