Hunter 212 vs Marlow-Hunter 22
How do the Hunter 212 and Marlow-Hunter 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 212 | Hunter 212 | Marlow-Hunter 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 18.0 ft5.49 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 1,800 lb816 kg | 1,700 lb771 kg |
| Ballast | 140 lb64 kg | 500 lb227 kg |
| Sail area | 202 ft²18.8 m² | 215 ft²20.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.84 | 24.15 |
| Displacement / Length | 138 | 115 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.7 | 8.5 |
| Capsize screening | 3.02 | 2.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.8 |
Hunter 212 vs Marlow-Hunter 22: the short version
- The Hunter 212 and Marlow-Hunter 22 are close in length (21.0 ft6.40 m vs 21.3 ft6.50 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Marlow-Hunter 22 carries the more powerful rig (24.2 vs 21.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Marlow-Hunter 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Marlow-Hunter 22 rates better for offshore work (2.65 vs 3.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.