Hunter 260 vs Hunter 27 Edge
How do the Hunter 260 and Hunter 27 Edge compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 260 
Hunter 27 Edge | Hunter 260 | Hunter 27 Edge | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.3 ft8.00 m | 26.4 ft8.03 m |
| Waterline length | 23.3 ft7.09 m | 24.2 ft7.37 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.73 m | 8.3 ft2.54 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 299 ft²27.8 m² | 288 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.36 | 20.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 178 | 109 |
| Comfort ratio | 17.2 | 12.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 2.21 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.6 |
Hunter 260 vs Hunter 27 Edge: the short version
- The Hunter 260 and Hunter 27 Edge are close in length (26.3 ft8.00 m vs 26.4 ft8.03 m ).
- The Hunter 260 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 27 Edge carries the more powerful rig (20.2 vs 16.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 260 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 260 rates better for offshore work (2.10 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.