Hunter 30T vs Hunter 31-2
How do the Hunter 30T and Hunter 31-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 30T 
Hunter 31-2 | Hunter 30T | Hunter 31-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.1 ft9.17 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 26.3 ft8.03 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Beam | 11.0 ft3.35 m | 11.1 ft3.38 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 10,500 lb4,763 kg | 8,505 lb3,858 kg |
| Ballast | 3,800 lb1,724 kg | 2,571 lb1,166 kg |
| Sail area | 434 ft²40.3 m² | 351 ft²32.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.48 | 13.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 257 | 171 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.2 | 18.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.1 |
Hunter 30T vs Hunter 31-2: the short version
- The Hunter 30T and Hunter 31-2 are close in length (30.1 ft9.17 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Hunter 30T is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 30T carries the more powerful rig (14.5 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 30T scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 30T rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.