Hunter 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend
How do the Hunter 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Hunter 37 | Hunter 37.5 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 37.0 ft11.28 m | 37.0 ft11.28 m |
| Waterline length | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 31.8 ft9.68 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.61 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 4.8 ft1.45 m |
| Displacement | 17,800 lb8,074 kg | 16,400 lb7,439 kg |
| Ballast | 6,850 lb3,107 kg | 5,900 lb2,676 kg |
| Sail area | 649 ft²60.3 m² | 704 ft²65.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.23 | 17.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 294 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 31.8 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.6 |
Hunter 37 vs Hunter 37.5 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 37 and Hunter 37.5 Legend are close in length (37.0 ft11.28 m vs 37.0 ft11.28 m ).
- The Hunter 37 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 37.5 Legend carries the more powerful rig (17.5 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 37 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 37 rates better for offshore work (1.82 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.