Hunter 40.5 vs Hunter 41
How do the Hunter 40.5 and Hunter 41 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 40.5 | Hunter 40.5 | Hunter 41 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.2 ft12.24 m | 40.3 ft12.29 m |
| Waterline length | 35.3 ft10.77 m | 35.5 ft10.82 m |
| Beam | 12.4 ft3.79 m | 13.3 ft4.04 m |
| Draft | 4.9 ft1.50 m | 6.5 ft1.98 m |
| Displacement | 20,000 lb9,072 kg | 19,400 lb8,800 kg |
| Ballast | 7,000 lb3,175 kg | 6,506 lb2,951 kg |
| Sail area | 760 ft²70.6 m² | 779 ft²72.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.50 | 17.26 |
| Displacement / Length | 202 | 194 |
| Comfort ratio | 29.3 | 26.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.97 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.0 | 8.0 |
Hunter 40.5 vs Hunter 41: the short version
- The Hunter 40.5 and Hunter 41 are close in length (40.2 ft12.24 m vs 40.3 ft12.29 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 41 carries the more powerful rig (17.3 vs 16.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 40.5 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 40.5 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 1.97).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.