Hunter 45 DS vs Hunter Passage 450
How do the Hunter 45 DS and Hunter Passage 450 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 45 DS 
Hunter Passage 450 | Hunter 45 DS | Hunter Passage 450 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.8 ft13.66 m | 44.3 ft13.49 m |
| Waterline length | 39.2 ft11.94 m | 38.6 ft11.76 m |
| Beam | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 5.5 ft1.68 m |
| Displacement | 22,937 lb10,404 kg | 26,180 lb11,875 kg |
| Ballast | 7,238 lb3,283 kg | 9,680 lb4,391 kg |
| Sail area | 833 ft²77.4 m² | 884 ft²82.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.51 | 16.04 |
| Displacement / Length | 170 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 24.6 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.89 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.3 |
Hunter 45 DS vs Hunter Passage 450: the short version
- The Hunter 45 DS is the larger boat at 44.8 ft13.66 m LOA versus 44.3 ft13.49 m for the Hunter Passage 450.
- The Hunter Passage 450 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 45 DS carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 16.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter Passage 450 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter Passage 450 rates better for offshore work (1.89 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.