Nonsuch 324 vs Nonsuch 33
How do the Nonsuch 324 and Nonsuch 33 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Nonsuch 324 | Nonsuch 324 | Nonsuch 33 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 32.3 ft9.85 m | 33.4 ft10.19 m |
| Waterline length | 28.8 ft8.76 m | 31.5 ft9.59 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.61 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.32 m | 5.3 ft1.62 m |
| Displacement | 11,500 lb5,216 kg | 15,350 lb6,963 kg |
| Ballast | 4,240 lb1,923 kg | 6,050 lb2,744 kg |
| Sail area | 689 ft²64.0 m² | 669 ft²62.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.64 | 17.33 |
| Displacement / Length | 216 | 220 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 25.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.10 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.5 |
Nonsuch 324 vs Nonsuch 33: the short version
- The Nonsuch 33 is the larger boat at 33.4 ft10.19 m LOA versus 32.3 ft9.85 m for the Nonsuch 324.
- The Nonsuch 33 is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Nonsuch 324 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 17.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Nonsuch 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Nonsuch 33 rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.