Swan 41 vs Swan 43
How do the Swan 41 and Swan 43 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 41 
Swan 43 | Swan 41 | Swan 43 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Waterline length | 30.3 ft9.22 m | 31.0 ft9.45 m |
| Beam | 11.9 ft3.64 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Displacement | 23,810 lb10,800 kg | 22,531 lb10,220 kg |
| Ballast | 9,700 lb4,400 kg | 10,400 lb4,717 kg |
| Sail area | 794 ft²73.8 m² | 821 ft²76.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.35 | 16.47 |
| Displacement / Length | 384 | 338 |
| Comfort ratio | 44.7 | 42.7 |
| Capsize screening | 1.66 | 1.65 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.5 |
Swan 41 vs Swan 43: the short version
- The Swan 43 is the larger boat at 31.0 ft9.45 m LOA versus 30.3 ft9.22 m for the Swan 41.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 43 carries the more powerful rig (16.5 vs 15.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 41 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 43 rates better for offshore work (1.65 vs 1.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.