Swan 441 vs Swan 47
How do the Swan 441 and Swan 47 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 441 
Swan 47 | Swan 441 | Swan 47 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.8 ft11.20 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Waterline length | 36.8 ft11.20 m | 36.3 ft11.05 m |
| Beam | 13.3 ft4.06 m | 13.8 ft4.19 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 7.6 ft2.33 m |
| Displacement | 24,692 lb11,200 kg | 32,408 lb14,700 kg |
| Ballast | 11,000 lb4,990 kg | 15,500 lb7,031 kg |
| Sail area | 1,248 ft²115.9 m² | 1,366 ft²126.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.55 | 21.50 |
| Displacement / Length | 222 | 304 |
| Comfort ratio | 33.0 | 42.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 1.73 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 8.1 |
Swan 441 vs Swan 47: the short version
- The Swan 441 is the larger boat at 36.8 ft11.20 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.05 m for the Swan 47.
- The Swan 47 is heavier, displacing about 31% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 441 carries the more powerful rig (23.5 vs 21.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 47 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 47 rates better for offshore work (1.73 vs 1.83).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.