Swan 57 vs Swan 57 Mk II
How do the Swan 57 and Swan 57 Mk II compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 57 
Swan 57 Mk II | Swan 57 | Swan 57 Mk II | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 45.8 ft13.96 m | 44.5 ft13.57 m |
| Waterline length | 45.8 ft13.96 m | 44.5 ft13.57 m |
| Beam | 15.8 ft4.83 m | 15.9 ft4.85 m |
| Draft | 9.1 ft2.77 m | 7.2 ft2.20 m |
| Displacement | 49,604 lb22,500 kg | 54,013 lb24,500 kg |
| Ballast | 18,900 lb8,573 kg | 20,348 lb9,230 kg |
| Sail area | 1,885 ft²175.1 m² | 1,350 ft²125.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 22.34 | 15.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 273 |
| Comfort ratio | 42.2 | 47.1 |
| Capsize screening | 1.73 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.1 | 8.9 |
Swan 57 vs Swan 57 Mk II: the short version
- The Swan 57 is the larger boat at 45.8 ft13.96 m LOA versus 44.5 ft13.57 m for the Swan 57 Mk II.
- The Swan 57 Mk II is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 57 carries the more powerful rig (22.3 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 57 Mk II scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 57 Mk II rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.73).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.