Swan 601 vs Swan 60OD
How do the Swan 601 and Swan 60OD compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 601 | Swan 601 | Swan 60OD | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 60.0 ft18.30 m | 61.9 ft18.86 m |
| Waterline length | 52.9 ft16.13 m | 54.8 ft16.70 m |
| Beam | 14.9 ft4.54 m | 16.7 ft5.09 m |
| Draft | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.8 ft3.60 m |
| Displacement | 39,683 lb18,000 kg | 42,990 lb19,500 kg |
| Ballast | 18,700 lb8,482 kg | 16,975 lb7,700 kg |
| Sail area | 2,380 ft²221.1 m² | 2,378 ft²220.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.73 | 31.00 |
| Displacement / Length | 120 | 117 |
| Comfort ratio | 30.5 | 27.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.75 | 1.91 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 9.7 | 9.9 |
Swan 601 vs Swan 60OD: the short version
- The Swan 60OD is the larger boat at 61.9 ft18.86 m LOA versus 60.0 ft18.30 m for the Swan 601.
- The Swan 60OD is heavier, displacing about 8% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 601 carries the more powerful rig (32.7 vs 31.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 601 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 601 rates better for offshore work (1.75 vs 1.91).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.