Swan 76 vs Swan 77
How do the Swan 76 and Swan 77 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Swan 76 | Swan 76 | Swan 77 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 61.4 ft18.70 m | 60.3 ft18.38 m |
| Waterline length | 61.4 ft18.70 m | 60.3 ft18.38 m |
| Beam | 19.0 ft5.80 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Draft | 11.8 ft3.60 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Displacement | 98,767 lb44,800 kg | 112,436 lb51,000 kg |
| Ballast | 24,000 lb10,886 kg | 39,683 lb18,000 kg |
| Sail area | 2,449 ft²227.5 m² | 2,811 ft²261.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.34 | 19.31 |
| Displacement / Length | 191 | 229 |
| Comfort ratio | 49.2 | 54.5 |
| Capsize screening | 1.65 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 10.5 | 10.4 |
Swan 76 vs Swan 77: the short version
- The Swan 76 is the larger boat at 61.4 ft18.70 m LOA versus 60.3 ft18.38 m for the Swan 77.
- The Swan 77 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Swan 77 carries the more powerful rig (19.3 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Swan 77 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Swan 77 rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 1.65).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.