Watkins 33 vs Watkins 36
How do the Watkins 33 and Watkins 36 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Watkins 33 | Watkins 33 | Watkins 36 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 33.1 ft10.08 m | 36.0 ft10.97 m |
| Waterline length | 26.6 ft8.10 m | 29.3 ft8.94 m |
| Beam | 10.2 ft3.10 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 11,200 lb5,080 kg | 17,000 lb7,711 kg |
| Ballast | 5,500 lb2,495 kg | 6,000 lb2,722 kg |
| Sail area | 469 ft²43.6 m² | 529 ft²49.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.99 | 12.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 266 | 301 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.6 | 36.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.82 | 1.63 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.9 | 7.3 |
Watkins 33 vs Watkins 36: the short version
- The Watkins 36 is the larger boat at 36.0 ft10.97 m LOA versus 33.1 ft10.08 m for the Watkins 33.
- The Watkins 36 is heavier, displacing about 52% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Watkins 33 carries the more powerful rig (15.0 vs 12.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Watkins 36 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Watkins 36 rates better for offshore work (1.63 vs 1.82).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.