Archambault Bagheera vs Archambault Coco
How do the Archambault Bagheera and Archambault Coco compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Bagheera | Archambault Bagheera | Archambault Coco | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 15.6 ft4.75 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Draft | 3.1 ft0.95 m | 4.5 ft1.36 m |
| Displacement | 882 lb400 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 463 lb210 kg | 992 lb450 kg |
| Sail area | 184 ft²17.1 m² | 285 ft²26.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 32.01 | 24.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 104 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 7.6 | 10.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.47 | 2.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.3 | 6.0 |
Archambault Bagheera vs Archambault Coco: the short version
- The Archambault Coco is the larger boat at 21.3 ft6.50 m LOA versus 19.7 ft6.00 m for the Archambault Bagheera.
- The Archambault Coco is heavier, displacing about 187% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 24.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault Coco scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault Bagheera rates better for offshore work (2.47 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.