Archambault Coco vs Sprinto
How do the Archambault Coco and Sprinto compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault Coco 
Sprinto | Archambault Coco | Sprinto | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.3 ft6.50 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 20.3 ft6.20 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.36 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 2,535 lb1,150 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | 992 lb450 kg | 441 lb200 kg |
| Sail area | 285 ft²26.5 m² | 203 ft²18.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.53 | 26.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 134 | 60 |
| Comfort ratio | 10.4 | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.60 | 2.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.0 | 6.2 |
Archambault Coco vs Sprinto: the short version
- The Archambault Coco and Sprinto are close in length (21.3 ft6.50 m vs 21.6 ft6.60 m ).
- The Archambault Coco is heavier, displacing about 92% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sprinto carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 24.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault Coco scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault Coco rates better for offshore work (2.60 vs 2.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.