C&C 26 Wave vs C&C 27 Mk V
How do the C&C 26 Wave and C&C 27 Mk V compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 26 Wave 
C&C 27 Mk V | C&C 26 Wave | C&C 27 Mk V | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.7 ft8.13 m | 26.5 ft8.08 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.3 ft2.82 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 4.8 ft1.46 m |
| Displacement | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 4,420 lb2,005 kg |
| Ballast | 1,700 lb771 kg | 1,715 lb778 kg |
| Sail area | 292 ft²27.1 m² | 343 ft²31.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.65 | 20.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 162 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.6 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
C&C 26 Wave vs C&C 27 Mk V: the short version
- The C&C 26 Wave and C&C 27 Mk V are close in length (26.7 ft8.13 m vs 26.5 ft8.08 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 Mk V carries the more powerful rig (20.4 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 26 Wave scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 26 Wave rates better for offshore work (2.21 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.