C&C 26 Wave vs C&C 27
How do the C&C 26 Wave and C&C 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 26 Wave 
C&C 27 | C&C 26 Wave | C&C 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 26.7 ft8.13 m | 27.9 ft8.49 m |
| Waterline length | 23.0 ft7.01 m | 22.9 ft6.97 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.82 m | 9.2 ft2.79 m |
| Draft | 2.9 ft0.89 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 5,500 lb2,495 kg |
| Ballast | 1,700 lb771 kg | 2,116 lb960 kg |
| Sail area | 292 ft²27.1 m² | 362 ft²33.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.65 | 18.59 |
| Displacement / Length | 172 | 206 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.6 | 18.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.21 | 2.08 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.4 |
C&C 26 Wave vs C&C 27: the short version
- The C&C 27 is the larger boat at 27.9 ft8.49 m LOA versus 26.7 ft8.13 m for the C&C 26 Wave.
- The C&C 27 is heavier, displacing about 17% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 27 carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 16.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 27 rates better for offshore work (2.08 vs 2.21).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.