C&C 29 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design
How do the C&C 29 and C&C Mega 30 One Design compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 29 
C&C Mega 30 One Design | C&C 29 | C&C Mega 30 One Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.6 ft9.02 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.19 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 10.3 ft3.15 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.60 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 7,500 lb3,402 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 2,700 lb1,225 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 422 ft²39.2 m² | 428 ft²39.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.62 | 25.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 255 | 98 |
| Comfort ratio | 20.4 | 15.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.11 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.0 |
C&C 29 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design: the short version
- The C&C 29 and C&C Mega 30 One Design are close in length (29.6 ft9.02 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- The C&C 29 is heavier, displacing about 67% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C Mega 30 One Design carries the more powerful rig (25.1 vs 17.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Mega 30 One Design rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.