C&C 30 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design
How do the C&C 30 and C&C Mega 30 One Design compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 30 
C&C Mega 30 One Design | C&C 30 | C&C Mega 30 One Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 29.9 ft9.12 m |
| Waterline length | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Beam | 10.0 ft3.05 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Draft | 5.0 ft1.52 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 8,000 lb3,629 kg | 4,500 lb2,041 kg |
| Ballast | 3,450 lb1,565 kg | 2,250 lb1,021 kg |
| Sail area | 459 ft²42.6 m² | 428 ft²39.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.36 | 25.12 |
| Displacement / Length | 231 | 98 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.8 | 15.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.00 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.7 | 7.0 |
C&C 30 vs C&C Mega 30 One Design: the short version
- The C&C 30 and C&C Mega 30 One Design are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 29.9 ft9.12 m ).
- The C&C 30 is heavier, displacing about 78% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C Mega 30 One Design carries the more powerful rig (25.1 vs 18.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C Mega 30 One Design rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.