C&C 34/36 vs C&C 36R
How do the C&C 34/36 and C&C 36R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 34/36 | C&C 34/36 | C&C 36R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.5 ft10.82 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | 30.8 ft9.40 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 12,700 lb5,761 kg |
| Ballast | 4,700 lb2,132 kg | 6,030 lb2,735 kg |
| Sail area | 636 ft²59.1 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.41 | 18.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 183 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.0 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.02 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.4 |
C&C 34/36 vs C&C 36R: the short version
- The C&C 34/36 and C&C 36R are close in length (35.5 ft10.82 m vs 35.1 ft10.69 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 34/36 carries the more powerful rig (19.4 vs 18.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.02).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.