C&C 36-1 vs C&C 36R
How do the C&C 36-1 and C&C 36R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 36-1 | C&C 36-1 | C&C 36R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.7 ft10.87 m | 35.1 ft10.69 m |
| Waterline length | 27.8 ft8.46 m | 30.5 ft9.30 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 11.2 ft3.40 m |
| Draft | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 6.0 ft1.83 m |
| Displacement | 12,000 lb5,443 kg | 12,700 lb5,761 kg |
| Ballast | 5,000 lb2,268 kg | 6,030 lb2,735 kg |
| Sail area | 599 ft²55.6 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.28 | 18.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 251 | 200 |
| Comfort ratio | 23.8 | 24.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.1 | 7.4 |
C&C 36-1 vs C&C 36R: the short version
- The C&C 36-1 is the larger boat at 35.7 ft10.87 m LOA versus 35.1 ft10.69 m for the C&C 36R.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 36R carries the more powerful rig (18.6 vs 18.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 36R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 36R rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 2.01).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.