C&C 48 Custom vs Landfall 48
How do the C&C 48 Custom and Landfall 48 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 48 Custom | C&C 48 Custom | Landfall 48 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 48.2 ft14.68 m | 47.5 ft14.48 m |
| Waterline length | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 37.3 ft11.38 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.17 m | 14.0 ft4.27 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 6.6 ft2.01 m |
| Displacement | 28,100 lb12,746 kg | 31,600 lb14,334 kg |
| Ballast | 12,750 lb5,783 kg | 12,300 lb5,579 kg |
| Sail area | 1,104 ft²102.6 m² | 960 ft²89.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.11 | 15.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 211 | 271 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.0 | 36.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 1.77 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.2 |
C&C 48 Custom vs Landfall 48: the short version
- The C&C 48 Custom is the larger boat at 48.2 ft14.68 m LOA versus 47.5 ft14.48 m for the Landfall 48.
- The Landfall 48 is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 48 Custom carries the more powerful rig (19.1 vs 15.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Landfall 48 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Landfall 48 rates better for offshore work (1.77 vs 1.80).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.