C&C 48 Custom vs C&C 50
How do the C&C 48 Custom and C&C 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
C&C 48 Custom | C&C 48 Custom | C&C 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 48.2 ft14.68 m | 49.8 ft15.19 m |
| Waterline length | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 39.0 ft11.89 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.17 m | 14.5 ft4.42 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.21 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Displacement | 28,100 lb12,746 kg | 31,100 lb14,107 kg |
| Ballast | 12,750 lb5,783 kg | 15,000 lb6,804 kg |
| Sail area | 1,104 ft²102.6 m² | 1,273 ft²118.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.11 | 20.60 |
| Displacement / Length | 211 | 234 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.0 | 32.3 |
| Capsize screening | 1.80 | 1.84 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.4 |
C&C 48 Custom vs C&C 50: the short version
- The C&C 50 is the larger boat at 49.8 ft15.19 m LOA versus 48.2 ft14.68 m for the C&C 48 Custom.
- The C&C 50 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 50 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 19.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 48 Custom rates better for offshore work (1.80 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.