C&C 50 vs C&C 51 Custom
How do the C&C 50 and C&C 51 Custom compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| C&C 50 | C&C 51 Custom | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 49.8 ft15.19 m | 51.8 ft15.77 m |
| Waterline length | 39.0 ft11.89 m | 43.9 ft13.39 m |
| Beam | 14.5 ft4.42 m | 13.6 ft4.14 m |
| Draft | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 9.9 ft3.02 m |
| Displacement | 31,100 lb14,107 kg | 33,800 lb15,331 kg |
| Ballast | 15,000 lb6,804 kg | 13,800 lb6,260 kg |
| Sail area | 1,273 ft²118.3 m² | 1,312 ft²121.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 20.60 | 20.08 |
| Displacement / Length | 234 | 178 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.3 | 35.0 |
| Capsize screening | 1.84 | 1.68 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.4 | 8.9 |
C&C 50 vs C&C 51 Custom: the short version
- The C&C 51 Custom is the larger boat at 51.8 ft15.77 m LOA versus 49.8 ft15.19 m for the C&C 50.
- The C&C 51 Custom is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 50 carries the more powerful rig (20.6 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The C&C 51 Custom scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the C&C 51 Custom rates better for offshore work (1.68 vs 1.84).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.