CS 395 vs CS 44
How do the CS 395 and CS 44 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 395 | CS 395 | CS 44 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 40.1 ft12.24 m | 44.1 ft13.44 m |
| Waterline length | 31.1 ft9.49 m | 34.7 ft10.57 m |
| Beam | 12.7 ft3.87 m | 13.7 ft4.17 m |
| Draft | 7.3 ft2.22 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Displacement | 12,786 lb5,800 kg | 22,000 lb9,979 kg |
| Ballast | 5,644 lb2,560 kg | 9,000 lb4,082 kg |
| Sail area | 747 ft²69.4 m² | 970 ft²90.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.86 | 19.77 |
| Displacement / Length | 189 | 236 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 27.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.17 | 1.95 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.5 | 7.9 |
CS 395 vs CS 44: the short version
- The CS 44 is the larger boat at 44.1 ft13.44 m LOA versus 40.1 ft12.24 m for the CS 395.
- The CS 44 is heavier, displacing about 72% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 395 carries the more powerful rig (21.9 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 44 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 44 rates better for offshore work (1.95 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.