CS 44 vs CS 50
How do the CS 44 and CS 50 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
CS 44 | CS 44 | CS 50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 44.1 ft13.44 m | 49.9 ft15.20 m |
| Waterline length | 34.7 ft10.57 m | 38.4 ft11.70 m |
| Beam | 13.7 ft4.17 m | 14.2 ft4.32 m |
| Draft | 8.2 ft2.49 m | 8.7 ft2.64 m |
| Displacement | 22,000 lb9,979 kg | 27,557 lb12,500 kg |
| Ballast | 9,000 lb4,082 kg | 12,125 lb5,500 kg |
| Sail area | 970 ft²90.1 m² | 1,390 ft²129.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.77 | 24.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 236 | 218 |
| Comfort ratio | 27.9 | 29.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.95 | 1.88 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 8.3 |
CS 44 vs CS 50: the short version
- The CS 50 is the larger boat at 49.9 ft15.20 m LOA versus 44.1 ft13.44 m for the CS 44.
- The CS 50 is heavier, displacing about 25% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the CS 50 carries the more powerful rig (24.4 vs 19.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The CS 50 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the CS 50 rates better for offshore work (1.88 vs 1.95).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.