Etap 35i vs Etap 38i
How do the Etap 35i and Etap 38i compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Etap 35i | Etap 35i | Etap 38i | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.8 ft10.62 m | 38.0 ft11.57 m |
| Waterline length | 29.0 ft8.84 m | 32.0 ft9.74 m |
| Beam | 11.5 ft3.51 m | 12.7 ft3.87 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 5.1 ft1.55 m |
| Displacement | 11,464 lb5,200 kg | 14,120 lb6,405 kg |
| Ballast | 3,836 lb1,740 kg | 4,850 lb2,200 kg |
| Sail area | 504 ft²46.8 m² | 599 ft²55.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.86 | 16.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 210 | 193 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.2 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.10 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.2 | 7.6 |
Etap 35i vs Etap 38i: the short version
- The Etap 38i is the larger boat at 38.0 ft11.57 m LOA versus 34.8 ft10.62 m for the Etap 35i.
- The Etap 38i is heavier, displacing about 23% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Etap 38i carries the more powerful rig (16.4 vs 15.9), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Etap 35i scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Etap 35i rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.10).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.