Hunter 25.5 vs Hunter 27-2
How do the Hunter 25.5 and Hunter 27-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 25.5 
Hunter 27-2 | Hunter 25.5 | Hunter 27-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.6 ft7.80 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 22.1 ft6.73 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 9.1 ft2.77 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 4,500 lb2,041 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 1,800 lb816 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 287 ft²26.7 m² | 307 ft²28.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.85 | 16.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 187 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 17.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.20 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.3 | 6.3 |
Hunter 25.5 vs Hunter 27-2: the short version
- The Hunter 25.5 and Hunter 27-2 are close in length (25.6 ft7.80 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- The Hunter 27-2 is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 25.5 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 27-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 27-2 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.20).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.