Hunter 26 vs Hunter 27-2
How do the Hunter 26 and Hunter 27-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 26 
Hunter 27-2 | Hunter 26 | Hunter 27-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.8 ft7.85 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Waterline length | 23.2 ft7.06 m | 22.4 ft6.83 m |
| Beam | 9.0 ft2.74 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 6.0 ft1.83 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 5,000 lb2,268 kg |
| Ballast | 2,000 lb907 kg | 2,000 lb907 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 307 ft²28.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 16.83 | 16.80 |
| Displacement / Length | 165 | 198 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.9 | 17.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Hunter 26 vs Hunter 27-2: the short version
- The Hunter 26 and Hunter 27-2 are close in length (25.8 ft7.85 m vs 25.6 ft7.80 m ).
- The Hunter 27-2 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 26 carries the more powerful rig (16.8 vs 16.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 27-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 27-2 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.