Hunter 306 vs Moorings 295
How do the Hunter 306 and Moorings 295 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 306 
Moorings 295 | Hunter 306 | Moorings 295 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.9 ft9.12 m | 29.5 ft8.99 m |
| Waterline length | 26.9 ft8.21 m | 27.0 ft8.23 m |
| Beam | 10.8 ft3.28 m | 10.5 ft3.20 m |
| Draft | 5.3 ft1.62 m | 4.0 ft1.22 m |
| Displacement | 7,150 lb3,243 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | 2,550 lb1,157 kg | 2,680 lb1,216 kg |
| Sail area | 350 ft²32.5 m² | 400 ft²37.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.09 | 16.70 |
| Displacement / Length | 164 | 170 |
| Comfort ratio | 16.8 | 18.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.23 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.0 | 7.0 |
Hunter 306 vs Moorings 295: the short version
- The Hunter 306 and Moorings 295 are close in length (29.9 ft9.12 m vs 29.5 ft8.99 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Moorings 295 carries the more powerful rig (16.7 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Moorings 295 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Moorings 295 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.23).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.