Hunter 35 Legend vs Hunter 36-2
How do the Hunter 35 Legend and Hunter 36-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 35 Legend 
Hunter 36-2 | Hunter 35 Legend | Hunter 36-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.6 ft10.84 m | 35.5 ft10.82 m |
| Waterline length | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 31.3 ft9.53 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.4 ft1.96 m |
| Displacement | 12,100 lb5,488 kg | 13,900 lb6,305 kg |
| Ballast | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 5,023 lb2,278 kg |
| Sail area | 593 ft²55.1 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.00 | 17.49 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 203 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 24.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Hunter 35 Legend vs Hunter 36-2: the short version
- The Hunter 35 Legend and Hunter 36-2 are close in length (35.6 ft10.84 m vs 35.5 ft10.82 m ).
- The Hunter 36-2 is heavier, displacing about 15% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 35 Legend carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 36-2 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 36-2 rates better for offshore work (2.00 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.