Hunter 35 Legend vs Hunter 36 Legend
How do the Hunter 35 Legend and Hunter 36 Legend compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Hunter 35 Legend 
Hunter 36 Legend | Hunter 35 Legend | Hunter 36 Legend | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 35.6 ft10.84 m | 35.7 ft10.89 m |
| Waterline length | 29.8 ft9.07 m | 31.5 ft9.61 m |
| Beam | 11.8 ft3.58 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 6.5 ft1.98 m | 6.8 ft2.08 m |
| Displacement | 12,100 lb5,488 kg | 14,330 lb6,500 kg |
| Ballast | 4,600 lb2,087 kg | 5,132 lb2,328 kg |
| Sail area | 593 ft²55.1 m² | 632 ft²58.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 18.00 | 17.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 205 | 204 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 23.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.05 | 2.03 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.3 | 7.5 |
Hunter 35 Legend vs Hunter 36 Legend: the short version
- The Hunter 35 Legend and Hunter 36 Legend are close in length (35.6 ft10.84 m vs 35.7 ft10.89 m ).
- The Hunter 36 Legend is heavier, displacing about 18% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Hunter 35 Legend carries the more powerful rig (18.0 vs 17.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Hunter 36 Legend scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Hunter 36 Legend rates better for offshore work (2.03 vs 2.05).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.